High carbon prices drive emissions cuts while border adjustments prevent offshoring pollution, protecting jobs and climate goals.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carbon Pricing |
Economy-wide carbon price at a moderate rate
|
Economy-wide carbon price at a moderate rate
|
Party
The Progressive Reform Party plants seeds of justice for workers young and old nurturing tomorrow’s roots today
Core pillars
Candidate for Presidency · Age 50
Martin Chapman traded his military uniform for a political stage, using his disciplined mind and media savvy to bridge the gap between grassroots idealism and institutional power.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 91 / 435 seats (20.9%)
Against: 258 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 86
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Social Democrats | 0 | Yes | We support this proposal. |
| Green Social Union | 0 | Yes | While this is not a huge change, it is a necessary one to ensure that corporations limit their carbon emissions. |
| Homeland Union | 85 | No | That's against the free market |
| Pax Americana | 105 | No | this will lead to outsourcing and severe unemployment |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 68 | No | No it's dangerous for workers |
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 91 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 21 / 100 seats (21.0%)
Against: 60 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 19
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Social Democrats | 0 | Yes | We support this proposal. |
| Green Social Union | 0 | Yes | While this is not a huge change, it is a necessary one to ensure that corporations limit their carbon emissions. |
| Homeland Union | 20 | No | That's against the free market |
| Pax Americana | 24 | No | this will lead to outsourcing and severe unemployment |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 16 | No | No it's dangerous for workers |
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 21 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We support this proposal.”
“While this is not a huge change, it is a necessary one to ensure that corporations limit their carbon emissions.”
“No it's dangerous for workers”
“this will lead to outsourcing and severe unemployment”
“That's against the free market”