“GSU supports some socialist principles, however, this bill goes too far!”
Full Nationalisation And Welfare Expansion Act of 2024
Rationale
These changes eliminate wealth inequality, ensure universal access to housing and healthcare, and prioritize quality of life by guaranteeing essentials regardless of income or status.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foreign Land Ownership |
Ban all foreign ownership of land and property
|
Abolish all private land ownership; all land held by the state
|
|
| 2 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Private, with strong regulation
|
Nationalise all key utilities and transport
|
|
| 3 | Social Housing |
Large municipal housing programme; right-to-buy abolished
|
Abolish private landlords; all rental housing is state-owned
|
|
| 4 | What Public Healthcare Covers |
Universal cover including dental and optical
|
Everything covered, cosmetic and elective included
|
|
| 5 | Retirement Age Policy |
Retirement at 70
|
Retirement at 50
|
1
Foreign Land Ownership2
Public Ownership of Key Industries3
Social Housing4
What Public Healthcare Covers5
Retirement Age PolicyProposer
Party
People's Revolutionary Communist Front
The Party is a vanguard of revolutionary action, guided by Castro and Guevara’s anti-imperialist legacy and Marxist-Leninist principles. We unite the working masses through revolutionary consciousness and armed struggle, determined to overthrow capitalist exploitation!
Core pillars
Sarah Fitzgerald
Secretary of State · Age 27
Raised in a working-class household, Sarah exchanged factory shifts for a scholarship, later becoming a sharp policy analyst whose unshakable integrity and loyalty to the movement never wavered.
Timeline
-
Draft23 March 2024
-
Vote Open23 March 2024
-
Vote Closed22 May 2024
-
Did Not Become Law22 May 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
House of Representatives
FailedFor: 94 / 435 seats (21.6%)
Against: 263 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 78
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Social Democrats | 35 | No | What's wrong with you? Can't support this communist bill |
| Green Social Union | 25 | No | GSU supports some socialist principles, however, this bill goes too far! |
| Homeland Union | 83 | No | This proposal is a direct affront to the free market |
| Pax Americana | 120 | No | Article 1, 3 and 5 are blatantly unconstitutional. This is the last straw. Arrests and censures to follow. |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front Proposer | 94 | Yes | No reason given |
Senate
FailedFor: 16 / 100 seats (16.0%)
Against: 44 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 40
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Social Democrats | 0 | No | What's wrong with you? Can't support this communist bill |
| Green Social Union | 0 | No | GSU supports some socialist principles, however, this bill goes too far! |
| Homeland Union | 20 | No | This proposal is a direct affront to the free market |
| Pax Americana | 24 | No | Article 1, 3 and 5 are blatantly unconstitutional. This is the last straw. Arrests and censures to follow. |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front Proposer | 16 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This proposal is a direct affront to the free market”
“What's wrong with you? Can't support this communist bill”
“Article 1, 3 and 5 are blatantly unconstitutional. This is the last straw. Arrests and censures to follow.”