“No. We need key utilities under government control”
Deregulate Key Industries Act of 2024
Rationale
Privatisation and light regulation increase efficiency, innovation and growth, benefiting consumers and the economy through lower costs and better services.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Private, with strong regulation
|
Privatise and lightly regulate
|
1
Public Ownership of Key IndustriesProposer
Party
Homeland Union
The Homeland Union forges strength from tradition and steel to guard our future as one nation under one flag.
Core pillars
Sophia Harding
Activist · Age 55
A working-class retiree from the military, Sophia Harding turned battlefield strategy into political firebrandry, wielding both bullets and soundbites to expose establishment failures with razor-sharp precision.
Timeline
-
Draft6 June 2024
-
Vote Open6 June 2024
-
Vote Closed5 August 2024
-
Did Not Become Law5 August 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
House of Representatives
FailedFor: 189 / 435 seats (43.4%)
Against: 246 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Social Democrats | 22 | No | No. We need key utilities under government control |
| Green Social Union | 40 | No | Regulation ensures that industries do what is best for the people. |
| Homeland Union Proposer | 103 | Yes | No reason given |
| Pax Americana | 86 | Yes | I don't see the objections to this |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 95 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Reform | 89 | No | This is not a good idea to pass |
Senate
PassedFor: 44 / 100 seats (44.0%)
Against: 37 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 19
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands Social Democrats | 0 | No | No. We need key utilities under government control |
| Green Social Union | 0 | No | Regulation ensures that industries do what is best for the people. |
| Homeland Union Proposer | 20 | Yes | No reason given |
| Pax Americana | 24 | Yes | I don't see the objections to this |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 16 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Reform | 21 | No | This is not a good idea to pass |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
Presidency
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Chapman | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“I don't see the objections to this”
“This is not a good idea to pass”
“Regulation ensures that industries do what is best for the people.”
“We can't support this bill”