Data Privacy Protection Act of 2010
Rationale
A total ban harms innovation and economic growth. Basic protections ensure privacy while allowing responsible data use for public benefit.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Data Privacy & Digital Rights |
Ban all personal data collection by private companies
|
Strict data rights (right to deletion; algorithmic transparency; heavy fines for violations)
|
1
Data Privacy & Digital RightsProposer
Party
Federalist
A nation of free minds and open markets, unshackled by dogma or tyranny, where liberty and prosperity rise together.
Core pillars
Harriet Lancaster
Activist · Age 51
A seasoned strategist with an iron will, Harriet Lancaster is known for cutting through ideological clutter to deliver results, earning both fierce loyalty and formidable opposition.
Timeline
-
Draft30 August 2010
-
Vote Open20 October 2010
-
Vote Closed19 December 2010
-
Became Law19 December 2010
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
House of Representatives
PassedFor: 227 / 435 seats (52.2%)
Against: 125 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 83
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cornishcrat | 0 | No | No reason given |
| Federalist Proposer | 227 | Yes | No reason given |
| Green Social Union | 69 | No | No reason given |
| Liberal Freedom | 56 | No | No reason given |
Senate
PassedFor: 52 / 100 seats (52.0%)
Against: 29 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 19
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cornishcrat | 0 | No | No reason given |
| Federalist Proposer | 52 | Yes | No reason given |
| Green Social Union | 16 | No | No reason given |
| Liberal Freedom | 13 | No | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federalist Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |