These changes strengthen public safety by enabling targeted surveillance against serious threats while ensuring police focus on violent crime, reducing unnecessary intrusion and protecting communities more effectively.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State Surveillance Powers |
Strict privacy protections (right to encryption; no bulk data collection; facial recognition banned)
|
Targeted surveillance (court order required; independent oversight commissioner)
|
|
| 2 | Police Powers |
Focus on highest impact crimes
|
Zero tolerance
|
Party
The Homeland Union forges strength from tradition and steel to guard our future as one nation under one flag.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 28
A rising firebrand at just 24, Adrian Chapman galvanised student movements before joining the party, earning a reputation as a charismatic speaker whose unshakable integrity and sharp analytical mind make him a trusted voice for radical yet disciplined reform.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 103 / 435 seats (23.7%)
Against: 310 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 22
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green Social Union | 40 | No | 'Protecting children' is just a front for mass surveillance. |
| Homeland Union Proposer | 103 | Yes | No reason given |
| Pax Americana | 86 | No | i think article 1 would have been sufficient, but then only in a crime wave |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 95 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Reform | 89 | No | This bill is against civil liberties |
For: 20 / 100 seats (20.0%)
Against: 61 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 19
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green Social Union | 0 | No | 'Protecting children' is just a front for mass surveillance. |
| Homeland Union Proposer | 20 | Yes | No reason given |
| Pax Americana | 24 | No | i think article 1 would have been sufficient, but then only in a crime wave |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 16 | No | We can't support this bill |
| Progressive Reform | 21 | No | This bill is against civil liberties |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Blake | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This bill is against civil liberties”
“'Protecting children' is just a front for mass surveillance.”
“i think article 1 would have been sufficient, but then only in a crime wave”
“We can't support this bill”