“Not a good idea to pass”
Citizenship Requirements Reform Act of 2020
Rationale
These changes ensure stable national identity by requiring residency before citizenship, reducing security risks and fostering long-term community integration for public benefit.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citizenship Requirements |
Automatic citizenship granted on arrival; no requirements whatsoever
|
Citizenship by birth on national soil and naturalisation after 5 years' residency
|
1
Citizenship RequirementsProposer
Party
Homeland Union
The Homeland Union forges strength from tradition and steel to guard our future as one nation under one flag.
Core pillars
Edward Brennan
Activist · Age 49
Edward Brennan built his reputation as a bridge between ideals and action, leveraging his decades-spanning network to turn lofty principles into tangible political victories while keeping the party’s message sharp in the public eye.
Timeline
-
Draft5 September 2020
-
Vote Open5 September 2020
-
Vote Closed4 November 2020
-
Became Law4 November 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
House of Representatives
PassedFor: 273 / 435 seats (62.8%)
Against: 46 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 116
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic Alliance | 4 | No | We have just passed a bill on citizenship. It hasn't even stayed for so long and now your changing it. Let's first see the results |
| Homeland Union Proposer | 37 | Yes | No reason given |
| Pax Americana | 199 | Yes | simple, common sensical, effective single policy proposal |
| Progressive Reform | 27 | No | Not a good idea to pass |
| Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats | 15 | No | Why would we turn away hands to turn the soil? |
| Ultra-Nationalist Movement | 37 | Yes | i'm agree promotes greater safety |
Senate
PassedFor: 62 / 100 seats (62.0%)
Against: 11 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 27
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic Alliance | 1 | No | We have just passed a bill on citizenship. It hasn't even stayed for so long and now your changing it. Let's first see the results |
| Homeland Union Proposer | 8 | Yes | No reason given |
| Pax Americana | 46 | Yes | simple, common sensical, effective single policy proposal |
| Progressive Reform | 6 | No | Not a good idea to pass |
| Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats | 4 | No | Why would we turn away hands to turn the soil? |
| Ultra-Nationalist Movement | 8 | Yes | i'm agree promotes greater safety |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pax Americana | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“i'm agree promotes greater safety”
“We have just passed a bill on citizenship. It hasn't even stayed for so long and now your changing it. Let's first see the results”
“Why would we turn away hands to turn the soil?”
“simple, common sensical, effective single policy proposal”