Tightly restricting hunting prevents cruelty, protects biodiversity, and ensures humane practices for public safety and ethical conservation.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hunting & Field Sports |
Licensed, regulated hunting
|
Tightly restricted
|
Party
The Progressive Reform Party plants seeds of justice for workers young and old nurturing tomorrow’s roots today
Core pillars
Candidate for Presidency · Age 50
Martin Chapman traded his military uniform for a political stage, using his disciplined mind and media savvy to bridge the gap between grassroots idealism and institutional power.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 49 / 435 seats (11.3%)
Against: 168 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 218
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free People Liberals | 36 | No | Simple regulation would be fine. |
| Homeland Union | 0 | No | the regulation right now is restrictive enough |
| Pax Americana | 98 | No | tightly regulated hunting is not great for conservation, deer populations tend to explode without checks |
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 49 | Yes | No reason given |
| Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats | 34 | No | How about policing the people that poach out of season rather than good people just trying to feed their families. |
For: 19 / 100 seats (19.0%)
Against: 37 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 44
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free People Liberals | 6 | No | Simple regulation would be fine. |
| Homeland Union | 0 | No | the regulation right now is restrictive enough |
| Pax Americana | 24 | No | tightly regulated hunting is not great for conservation, deer populations tend to explode without checks |
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 19 | Yes | No reason given |
| Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats | 7 | No | How about policing the people that poach out of season rather than good people just trying to feed their families. |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pax Americana | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“How about policing the people that poach out of season rather than good people just trying to feed their families.”
“the regulation right now is restrictive enough”
“Simple regulation would be fine.”
“tightly regulated hunting is not great for conservation, deer populations tend to explode without checks”