These changes address systemic risks from unchecked AI, job losses from automation, climate damage from weak emissions, and financial instability from deregulated banking—urgently protecting public safety and economic stability.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI Development & Safety |
Balanced oversight
|
Ban / moratorium on advanced AI development
|
|
| 2 | Automation & the Workforce |
Market-led automation
|
Permit automation with strong retraining/transition rights
|
|
| 3 | Vehicle Emissions Standards |
Emissions limits with gradual phase-in for new vehicles
|
Strict emissions standards with immediate enforcement and heavy fines
|
|
| 4 | Banking & Financial Regulation |
Strong prudential oversight
|
Capital controls, separated retail/investment banking
|
Party
The Progressive Reform Party plants seeds of justice for workers young and old nurturing tomorrow’s roots today
Core pillars
Candidate for Presidency · Age 50
Martin Chapman traded his military uniform for a political stage, using his disciplined mind and media savvy to bridge the gap between grassroots idealism and institutional power.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 42 / 435 seats (9.7%)
Against: 240 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 153
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic Alliance | 4 | No | A very bad bill No we cant |
| Homeland Union | 37 | No | Banning AI is not a good idea |
| Pax Americana | 199 | No | tribune of the people eh? |
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 27 | Yes | No reason given |
| Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats | 15 | Yes | Eh, half I guess. I don't have any seats anyway |
| Together - Worker's Alliance | 0 | Abstain | While we support the proposed changes on worker's rights, enviornmental regulations should remain loose to maximize industry output. |
For: 10 / 100 seats (10.0%)
Against: 55 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 35
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic Alliance | 1 | No | A very bad bill No we cant |
| Homeland Union | 8 | No | Banning AI is not a good idea |
| Pax Americana | 46 | No | tribune of the people eh? |
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 6 | Yes | No reason given |
| Socialist Broadlands Union Technocrats | 4 | Yes | Eh, half I guess. I don't have any seats anyway |
| Together - Worker's Alliance | 0 | Abstain | While we support the proposed changes on worker's rights, enviornmental regulations should remain loose to maximize industry output. |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homeland Union | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“A very bad bill No we cant”
“While we support the proposed changes on worker's rights, enviornmental regulations should remain loose to maximize industry output.”
“Banning AI is not a good idea”
“tribune of the people eh?”
“Eh, half I guess. I don't have any seats anyway”