“We support a universal service obligation, but government owned broadband requires a huge investment and continuous upgradation. We need to maintain private sector competition in technological sector but not reduce it”
National Broadband Network Establishment Act of 2024
Rationale
Centralizing broadband into a state-owned network ensures universal, reliable access and reduces private-sector inefficiencies to meet public needs.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Broadband & Digital Access |
Subsidies for rural and hard-to-reach areas
|
State-owned national broadband network
|
1
Broadband & Digital AccessProposer
Party
Progressive Reform
The Progressive Reform Party plants seeds of justice for workers young and old nurturing tomorrow’s roots today
Core pillars
Martin Chapman
Candidate for Presidency · Age 50
Martin Chapman traded his military uniform for a political stage, using his disciplined mind and media savvy to bridge the gap between grassroots idealism and institutional power.
Timeline
-
Draft3 September 2024
-
Vote Open3 September 2024
-
Vote Closed2 November 2024
-
Did Not Become Law2 November 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
House of Representatives
FailedFor: 198 / 435 seats (45.5%)
Against: 237 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands People's Alliance | 2 | No | We support a universal service obligation, but government owned broadband requires a huge investment and continuous upgradation. We need to maintain private sector competition in technological sector but not reduce it |
| Green Social Union | 82 | Yes | This would allow everyone to connect and interact with the internet, which is now the backbone of modern society. |
| Homeland Union | 126 | No | Can´t go with this because we want a liberal economy |
| Pax Americana | 109 | No | this gives a -1.5 malus to the tech sector |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 54 | Yes | We support this bill |
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 62 | Yes | No reason given |
Senate
FailedFor: 42 / 100 seats (42.0%)
Against: 52 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 6
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadlands People's Alliance | 0 | No | We support a universal service obligation, but government owned broadband requires a huge investment and continuous upgradation. We need to maintain private sector competition in technological sector but not reduce it |
| Green Social Union | 14 | Yes | This would allow everyone to connect and interact with the internet, which is now the backbone of modern society. |
| Homeland Union | 23 | No | Can´t go with this because we want a liberal economy |
| Pax Americana | 29 | No | this gives a -1.5 malus to the tech sector |
| People's Revolutionary Communist Front | 13 | Yes | We support this bill |
| Progressive Reform Proposer | 15 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 6 | Not voted |
Presidency
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bernard Blake | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“this gives a -1.5 malus to the tech sector”
“This would allow everyone to connect and interact with the internet, which is now the backbone of modern society.”
“Can´t go with this because we want a liberal economy”
“We support this bill”