Expanding nuclear power will rapidly cut carbon emissions while ensuring energy security and stable prices for households.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nuclear Power |
Maintain existing nuclear only
|
Major nuclear build-out
|
Party
The Bessarian Social Democrats stand with workers, families and the vulnerable. We build bridges not walls and light the way to justice through shared wealth
Core pillars
Activist · Age 39
A Cambridge-trained economist who wrote her doctoral thesis on universal basic income, Elizabeth Chambers turned her sharp analytical mind into fiery public arguments that have radicalised a generation of voters with her data-driven calls for systemic overhaul.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 131 / 375 seats (34.9%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 217 · Not voted: 27
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bessarian Social Democrats Proposer | 37 | Yes | No reason given |
| Conservative People's Pact | 217 | Abstain | Nuclear power is reckless and stinky and we have no intention to vote for this! |
| Union Of The Socialist Majority | 94 | Yes | Nuclear power is the future, and we believe we should move towards it. |
For: 49 / 130 seats (37.7%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 30 · Not voted: 51
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bessarian Social Democrats Proposer | 23 | Yes | No reason given |
| Conservative People's Pact | 30 | Abstain | Nuclear power is reckless and stinky and we have no intention to vote for this! |
| Union Of The Socialist Majority | 26 | Yes | Nuclear power is the future, and we believe we should move towards it. |
| Empty seats | 43 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Nuclear power is the future, and we believe we should move towards it.”
“Nuclear power is reckless and stinky and we have no intention to vote for this!”