These reforms strengthen social equity, safety, and justice by prioritizing universal support, disarmament, veteran welfare, child protection, and public safety.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Social Care for the Elderly |
Capped lifetime care costs
|
Free universal social care
|
|
| 2 | Nuclear Weapons |
Maintain a minimal deterrent
|
Retain weapons, pledge no first use
|
|
| 3 | Veterans' Affairs |
Dedicated veterans' services
|
Guaranteed housing, healthcare, pensions for veterans
|
|
| 4 | Corporal Punishment |
Corporal punishment banned in justice system and schools
|
Constitutional ban on all physical punishment including by parents at home
|
|
| 5 | Repeat Offender Sentencing |
Judges set sentences case-by-case
|
Escalating mandatory minimums
|
Party
The National Rally is A Party founded by Sabrine Fuchs in April 2020 supported by a Movement rising fast in Popularity since the Decline of the Belvarian Nation known as "The Naroes", who were tired of the Leftist governement and wanted the rebirth of Belvarian Pride on the International Stage
Core pillars
Activist · Age 49
Sabine Fuchs parlayed her outsider status as a corporate lobbyist into a political career, wielding her razor-sharp media savvy and commanding presence to dominate debates and reshape public perception.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 52 / 70 seats (74.3%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 18
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amish League | 0 | Abstain | Given circumstances make it unnecessary to provide a definitive vote, and we unremittingly refuse to vote in favor of a bill proposed by a party who hates us based our religion. A detestable state prohibited by the Constitution no less. |
| Just A Couple Chill Guys | 14 | Yes | Yeah this seems pretty chill |
| Liberal | 15 | Yes | This sounds so good we aggre |
| Liberty For Belvaria! | 5 | Yes | While it increases government spending with an increase in social care, a tough-on-crime approach and no-nonsense defence policy means we can agree to it. |
| The National Rally Proposer | 5 | Yes | No reason given |
| Together We Can | 6 | Yes | After a review of the policies, we have reluctantly decided to support this reform. |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 7 | Yes | While we may not agree with Number 5, we agree with the rest. |
For: 377 / 500 seats (75.4%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 123
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amish League | 0 | Abstain | Given circumstances make it unnecessary to provide a definitive vote, and we unremittingly refuse to vote in favor of a bill proposed by a party who hates us based our religion. A detestable state prohibited by the Constitution no less. |
| Just A Couple Chill Guys | 91 | Yes | Yeah this seems pretty chill |
| Liberal | 114 | Yes | This sounds so good we aggre |
| Liberty For Belvaria! | 22 | Yes | While it increases government spending with an increase in social care, a tough-on-crime approach and no-nonsense defence policy means we can agree to it. |
| The National Rally Proposer | 55 | Yes | No reason given |
| Together We Can | 45 | Yes | After a review of the policies, we have reluctantly decided to support this reform. |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 50 | Yes | While we may not agree with Number 5, we agree with the rest. |
| Empty seats | 73 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Just A Couple Chill Guys | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“While it increases government spending with an increase in social care, a tough-on-crime approach and no-nonsense defence policy means we can agree to it.”
“Yeah this seems pretty chill”
“After a review of the policies, we have reluctantly decided to support this reform.”
“While we may not agree with Number 5, we agree with the rest.”
“Given circumstances make it unnecessary to provide a definitive vote, and we unremittingly refuse to vote in favor of a bill proposed by a party who hates us based our religion. A detestable state prohibited by the Constitution no less.”
“This sounds so good we aggre”
“While we support law 1, 3 and 4, we cannot support law 2.”