These changes strengthen family stability, protect children’s rights, and uphold public morals by requiring accountability in divorce, ensuring parental bonding, and preventing exploitation through criminalization.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Divorce Law |
No-fault divorce, standard process
|
Fault must be proven
|
|
| 2 | Parental Leave Policy |
Shared, non-transferable parental leave (use-it-or-lose-it for each parent)
|
Mandatory one-year leave for both parents; employers may not contact them
|
|
| 3 | Sex Work |
Legal, licensed and regulated
|
Fully criminalised
|
Party
A party of rooted tradition and unshackled liberty guided by divine purpose and self-reliance.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 28
Lena Jung burst onto the scene as the fiery voice of a new generation, her idealism and media savvy turning her from campus activist to national sensation almost overnight.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 0 / 70 seats (0.0%)
Against: 7 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 63
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amish League Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Belvarian Forward League | 0 | Yes | While the act may be a bit stronger than the League would like, it is a step in the right direction. |
| Liberty For Belvaria! | 0 | No | Where is the freedom of autonomy for the citizen? |
| Together We Can | 0 | No | We do not support this act, which would infringe on the civil liberties of Belvarians. |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 7 | No | We cannot support this |
For: 0 / 500 seats (0.0%)
Against: 21 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 479
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amish League Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Belvarian Forward League | 0 | Yes | While the act may be a bit stronger than the League would like, it is a step in the right direction. |
| Liberty For Belvaria! | 0 | No | Where is the freedom of autonomy for the citizen? |
| Together We Can | 0 | No | We do not support this act, which would infringe on the civil liberties of Belvarians. |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 21 | No | We cannot support this |
| Empty seats | 73 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We cannot support this”
“We do not support this act, which would infringe on the civil liberties of Belvarians.”
“Where is the freedom of autonomy for the citizen?”
“While the act may be a bit stronger than the League would like, it is a step in the right direction.”