“Since we think exactly the same way, we voted yes.”
Public Security & Safety Act of 2023
Rationale
Our people should feel safe they demand stricter policies this proposal will make our system tougher, reduce crime and make our people feel that justice is being served. We cannot allow those who have reoffended to roam our streets let this proposal be a deterrent to those who wish to commit crimes
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Age of Criminal Responsibility |
From 16
|
From age 12
|
|
| 2 | Repeat Offender Sentencing |
Reoffending triggers rehabilitation orders
|
Escalating mandatory minimums
|
|
| 3 | State Surveillance Powers |
Strict privacy protections (right to encryption; no bulk data collection; facial recognition banned)
|
Targeted surveillance (court order required; independent oversight commissioner)
|
1
Age of Criminal Responsibility2
Repeat Offender Sentencing3
State Surveillance PowersProposer
Party
Belvarian Peoples Union
A revolutionary movement of workers fighting for a fair and powerful nation We oppose rule by wealthy elites and fight for public ownership workers rights social equality and an economy serving the people Together we will build a new society where power and prosperity belong to all
Core pillars
Jürgen Wagner
Candidate for Federal Chancellor · Age 44
A former financial regulator turned whistleblower, his sharp analytical mind and unshakable integrity made him a feared investigator of corporate corruption before he leveraged his media savvy to expose systemic rot.
Timeline
-
Draft3 July 2023
-
Vote Open4 July 2023
-
Vote Closed2 September 2023
-
Did Not Become Law2 September 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Federal Council
PassedFor: 22 / 70 seats (31.4%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 48
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belvarian Peoples Union Proposer | 20 | Yes | No reason given |
| Freedom For Us | 2 | Yes | This aligns with people's demand to raise justice, police and internal security spending, which we pledged. |
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria | 0 | Yes | Since we think exactly the same way, we voted yes. |
National Parliament
PassedFor: 161 / 500 seats (32.2%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 339
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belvarian Peoples Union Proposer | 142 | Yes | No reason given |
| Freedom For Us | 19 | Yes | This aligns with people's demand to raise justice, police and internal security spending, which we pledged. |
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria | 0 | Yes | Since we think exactly the same way, we voted yes. |
| Empty seats | 73 | Not voted |
Federal Chancellor
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
President
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This aligns with people's demand to raise justice, police and internal security spending, which we pledged.”