Strengthens public order and safety by preventing disruptive protests that risk violence or property damage.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Right to Protest |
Unrestricted right to assemble
|
Heavily restricted, easy to ban
|
Party
Belvaria’s future is carved by the hands that plant and the voices that guard. Education blooms under watchful borders and skies unchained.
Core pillars
President · Age 34
A masterful networker and media strategist, she blends razor-sharp analysis with an instinct for the public mood, crafting narratives that win over skeptics—though her quiet demeanor belies the fire that sets her inner circle ablaze.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 15 / 70 seats (21.4%)
Against: 45 · Abstained: 10 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For Belvaria | 3 | Abstain | we prefer a protest with no violence, but this law removes protest entirely, if not a lot. |
| Belvarian Peoples Union | 10 | No | Although we do think protest should be regulated to ensure that protest remain peaceful and within the law however this proposal is too extreme and may cause issues among our people |
| Citizen Core | 7 | Abstain | we dont believe in the current law but this is too far |
| Freedom For Us | 28 | No | The Constitution’s Article XIV secures the right to peaceful protest; dissolving such assemblies requires a compelling justification and evidence that no less restrictive option exists. Our Party considers this amendment unconstitutional. |
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria Proposer | 15 | Yes | No reason given |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 7 | No | We cannot support this! |
For: 103 / 500 seats (20.6%)
Against: 279 · Abstained: 45 · Not voted: 73
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For Belvaria | 18 | Abstain | we prefer a protest with no violence, but this law removes protest entirely, if not a lot. |
| Belvarian Peoples Union | 109 | No | Although we do think protest should be regulated to ensure that protest remain peaceful and within the law however this proposal is too extreme and may cause issues among our people |
| Citizen Core | 27 | Abstain | we dont believe in the current law but this is too far |
| Freedom For Us | 149 | No | The Constitution’s Article XIV secures the right to peaceful protest; dissolving such assemblies requires a compelling justification and evidence that no less restrictive option exists. Our Party considers this amendment unconstitutional. |
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria Proposer | 103 | Yes | No reason given |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 21 | No | We cannot support this! |
| Empty seats | 73 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clara König | 1 | No | No reason given |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ursula Hoffmann Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We cannot support this!”
“we prefer a protest with no violence, but this law removes protest entirely, if not a lot.”
“we dont believe in the current law but this is too far”
“Although we do think protest should be regulated to ensure that protest remain peaceful and within the law however this proposal is too extreme and may cause issues among our people”
“The Constitution’s Article XIV secures the right to peaceful protest; dissolving such assemblies requires a compelling justification and evidence that no less restrictive option exists. Our Party considers this amendment unconstitutional.”