Rising violent crime and officer safety risks demand frontline officers carry firearms. Zero tolerance policing deters repeat offenders and restores public confidence.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Armed Police |
Mostly unarmed; specialist armed units on call
|
All frontline officers routinely armed
|
|
| 2 | Police Powers |
Community policing focused on prevention
|
Zero tolerance
|
Party
Liberty for Belvaria champions bold minds and free hands to build wealth and second chances under the open sky. The nation is a safe haven for ambition - and freedom is the way of the future.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 43
A former economics professor turned party strategist, Lena Kaiser’s sharp intellect and media savvy have made her a trusted voice in shaping policy, though her unwavering loyalty to the leadership sometimes blinds her to dissent.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 0 / 70 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 70
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amish League | 0 | Yes | Harsh? Yes. Useful? Possibly. Supported by the majority of the public? Surprisingly, yes. And it stays in line with Amish values, so it has our support. |
| Federalist Reform | 0 | No | We oppose the Police Reform Act because it threatens liberty and trust. Armed officers everywhere risks abuse of power. Zero tolerance policing creates fear, not safety. True security comes from community engagement—*not* turning every officer into an enforcer. This bill sacrifices civil rights for a false sense of control. |
| Liberty For Belvaria! Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Together We Can | 0 | No | This is an authoritarian proposal that compromises civil liberties in favor of state control. |
For: 0 / 500 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 500
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amish League | 0 | Yes | Harsh? Yes. Useful? Possibly. Supported by the majority of the public? Surprisingly, yes. And it stays in line with Amish values, so it has our support. |
| Federalist Reform | 0 | No | We oppose the Police Reform Act because it threatens liberty and trust. Armed officers everywhere risks abuse of power. Zero tolerance policing creates fear, not safety. True security comes from community engagement—*not* turning every officer into an enforcer. This bill sacrifices civil rights for a false sense of control. |
| Liberty For Belvaria! Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Together We Can | 0 | No | This is an authoritarian proposal that compromises civil liberties in favor of state control. |
| Empty seats | 73 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Harsh? Yes. Useful? Possibly. Supported by the majority of the public? Surprisingly, yes. And it stays in line with Amish values, so it has our support.”
“We oppose the Police Reform Act because it threatens liberty and trust. Armed officers everywhere risks abuse of power. Zero tolerance policing creates fear, not safety. True security comes from community engagement—*not* turning every officer into an enforcer. This bill sacrifices civil rights for a false sense of control.”
“This is an authoritarian proposal that compromises civil liberties in favor of state control.”