I know this is bad but if we pension age are already to young if we do this then we will have money to other social reforms or tax cuts and the nuclear energy i importent for energy and will get econmic growth
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Retirement Age Policy |
Retirement at 50
|
Retirement at 60
|
|
| 2 | Nuclear Power |
Maintain existing nuclear only
|
Major nuclear build-out
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 34 / 70 seats (48.6%)
Against: 12 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 24
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance Rn | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Amish League | 0 | Abstain | Since we support one Article but oppose the other, we have decided to withhold our official vote on the matter. |
| Just A Couple Chill Guys | 14 | Yes | 60 is a completely reasonable age to retire |
| Liberal Proposer | 15 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberty For Belvaria! | 5 | No | Major deprivation of liberty for the older generation, and an unnecessary accelerant on the cost of living for lower income classes. |
| The National Rally | 5 | Yes | age 60 sounds like a reasonable pension age, and we should invest in our industry |
| Together We Can | 0 | Abstain | The retirement age policy is cruel, we cannot support it. However, we do support a nuclear power build-out policy, as nuclear power, if well-maintained, is, despite popular belief, an amazing source of abundant, cheap and green energy. |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 7 | No | On the one hand, our nuclear arsenal should not be expanded; on the other hand, such a drastic increase in the retirement age is harmful to our population |
For: 260 / 500 seats (52.0%)
Against: 72 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 168
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance Rn | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Amish League | 0 | Abstain | Since we support one Article but oppose the other, we have decided to withhold our official vote on the matter. |
| Just A Couple Chill Guys | 91 | Yes | 60 is a completely reasonable age to retire |
| Liberal Proposer | 114 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberty For Belvaria! | 22 | No | Major deprivation of liberty for the older generation, and an unnecessary accelerant on the cost of living for lower income classes. |
| The National Rally | 55 | Yes | age 60 sounds like a reasonable pension age, and we should invest in our industry |
| Together We Can | 0 | Abstain | The retirement age policy is cruel, we cannot support it. However, we do support a nuclear power build-out policy, as nuclear power, if well-maintained, is, despite popular belief, an amazing source of abundant, cheap and green energy. |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 50 | No | On the one hand, our nuclear arsenal should not be expanded; on the other hand, such a drastic increase in the retirement age is harmful to our population |
| Empty seats | 73 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Just A Couple Chill Guys | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Major deprivation of liberty for the older generation, and an unnecessary accelerant on the cost of living for lower income classes.”
“The retirement age policy is cruel, we cannot support it. However, we do support a nuclear power build-out policy, as nuclear power, if well-maintained, is, despite popular belief, an amazing source of abundant, cheap and green energy.”
“Since we support one Article but oppose the other, we have decided to withhold our official vote on the matter.”
“60 is a completely reasonable age to retire”
“On the one hand, our nuclear arsenal should not be expanded; on the other hand, such a drastic increase in the retirement age is harmful to our population”
“age 60 sounds like a reasonable pension age, and we should invest in our industry”
“We support retraction of pension services but we cannot support post-industrial technology, especially nuclear.”