we can not heavily rely on the private sector the people should take back control and regulate it so these private organizations will work for the people not for profit. This proposal will give greater control over the private sector allowing revenue to flow directly into the peoples hands
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Privatise and lightly regulate
|
Public ownership of natural monopolies
|
|
| 2 | Banking & Financial Regulation |
Deregulated financial centre
|
Strong prudential oversight
|
|
| 3 | Rent Control |
No controls; market sets rents
|
Light stabilisation, mostly market rents
|
Party
A revolutionary movement of workers fighting for a fair and powerful nation We oppose rule by wealthy elites and fight for public ownership workers rights social equality and an economy serving the people Together we will build a new society where power and prosperity belong to all
Core pillars
Candidate for Federal Chancellor · Age 44
A former financial regulator turned whistleblower, his sharp analytical mind and unshakable integrity made him a feared investigator of corporate corruption before he leveraged his media savvy to expose systemic rot.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 56 / 70 seats (80.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 14
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist Association | 7 | Yes | The private market is a mistake our nation made. This law aims to regulate it, which we support. |
| Belvarian Peoples Union Proposer | 17 | Yes | No reason given |
| Freedom For Us | 17 | Yes | Market economy does not entail laissez-faire; appropriate regulation is preferable. We concur with the proposing party. |
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria | 15 | Yes | This law has long been necessary. |
For: 401 / 500 seats (80.2%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 99
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist Association | 55 | Yes | The private market is a mistake our nation made. This law aims to regulate it, which we support. |
| Belvarian Peoples Union Proposer | 119 | Yes | No reason given |
| Freedom For Us | 121 | Yes | Market economy does not entail laissez-faire; appropriate regulation is preferable. We concur with the proposing party. |
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria | 106 | Yes | This law has long been necessary. |
| Empty seats | 73 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This law has long been necessary.”
“The private market is a mistake our nation made. This law aims to regulate it, which we support.”
“Market economy does not entail laissez-faire; appropriate regulation is preferable. We concur with the proposing party.”