“The bloated state yet again clamping down on economic freedom and market freedom under the moniker of 'regulations' and 'safety' is nothing new, but to allow this law to pass would be the beginning of democratic backsliding as the state imposes increasing laws to stifle the liberty of the market.”
Modern Standards Act of 2021
Rationale
These changes prioritize universal rights, worker wellbeing, and consumer safety, addressing unmet needs and systemic inequities in housing, care, labor, and corporate accountability.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Homelessness |
Shelters and support services
|
Guaranteed housing-first support
|
|
| 2 | Social Care for the Elderly |
Capped lifetime care costs
|
Free universal social care
|
|
| 3 | Maximum Working Hours |
40-hour weekly maximum with overtime controls
|
35-hour weekly maximum
|
|
| 4 | Consumer Protection |
Multi-year warranties, no-quibble refunds for faulty goods, enforced safety standards
|
Lifetime right to repair, mandatory long warranties, automatic recalls, class actions, a regulator that fines and bans products
|
|
| 5 | Lobbying & Political Donations |
Disclosure rules, few limits
|
Strict caps and a public lobbying register
|
1
Homelessness2
Social Care for the Elderly3
Maximum Working Hours4
Consumer Protection5
Lobbying & Political DonationsProposer
Party
United Left Of Belvaria
The United Left of Belvaria stands for democratic socialism, economic justice and strong public services. We fight against inequality, corporate influence and poverty, putting people before profit and building a Belvaria that works for everyone.
Core pillars
Michael Walter
Deputy Federal Chancellor · Age 60
Once a factory worker turned labor scholar, Michael Walter spent decades in academia before becoming the party’s most vocal champion of radical economic reform, known for fiery speeches that electrify both protesters and press alike.
Timeline
-
Draft5 January 2021
-
Vote Open5 January 2021
-
Vote Closed6 March 2021
-
Did Not Become Law6 March 2021
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Federal Council
FailedFor: 18 / 70 seats (25.7%)
Against: 35 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 17
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amish League | 15 | No | We're all for reasonable social welfare, but this infringes upon our Libertarian views a little too much. |
| Just A Couple Chill Guys | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Liberal | 15 | No | It sounds good but its bad this will destroy the econmy in days |
| Liberty For Belvaria! | 5 | No | The bloated state yet again clamping down on economic freedom and market freedom under the moniker of 'regulations' and 'safety' is nothing new, but to allow this law to pass would be the beginning of democratic backsliding as the state imposes increasing laws to stifle the liberty of the market. |
| The National Rally | 5 | Yes | This will greatly improve our nation |
| Together We Can | 6 | Yes | We strongly support this proposal. |
| United Left Of Belvaria Proposer | 7 | Yes | No reason given |
National Parliament
FailedFor: 150 / 500 seats (30.0%)
Against: 217 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 133
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amish League | 81 | No | We're all for reasonable social welfare, but this infringes upon our Libertarian views a little too much. |
| Just A Couple Chill Guys | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Liberal | 114 | No | It sounds good but its bad this will destroy the econmy in days |
| Liberty For Belvaria! | 22 | No | The bloated state yet again clamping down on economic freedom and market freedom under the moniker of 'regulations' and 'safety' is nothing new, but to allow this law to pass would be the beginning of democratic backsliding as the state imposes increasing laws to stifle the liberty of the market. |
| The National Rally | 55 | Yes | This will greatly improve our nation |
| Together We Can | 45 | Yes | We strongly support this proposal. |
| United Left Of Belvaria Proposer | 50 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 73 | Not voted |
Federal Chancellor
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | 1 | No | No reason given |
President
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We strongly support this proposal.”
“It sounds good but its bad this will destroy the econmy in days”
“We're all for reasonable social welfare, but this infringes upon our Libertarian views a little too much.”
“This will greatly improve our nation”