These changes modernize defense and rights to better secure public safety and sovereignty in evolving threats.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Autonomous Weapons Systems |
Permitted with mandatory human control
|
Deploy fully autonomous lethal weapons
|
|
| 2 | Nuclear Weapons |
Retain weapons, pledge no first use
|
Maintain a minimal deterrent
|
|
| 3 | Firearms Control |
Broad right to own with light checks
|
Constitutional right to carry
|
Party
Liberty for Belvaria champions bold minds and free hands to build wealth and second chances under the open sky. The nation is a safe haven for ambition - and freedom is the way of the future.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 43
A former economics professor turned party strategist, Lena Kaiser’s sharp intellect and media savvy have made her a trusted voice in shaping policy, though her unwavering loyalty to the leadership sometimes blinds her to dissent.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 12 / 70 seats (17.1%)
Against: 18 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 40
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amish League | 0 | Abstain | We are not opposed to this bill per se, but we do not support it enough for the widespread public hate it has garnered to be worth a vote in favor. |
| Federalist Reform | 0 | No | We oppose the Military and Arms Expansion Act because it risks turning Belvaria into an aggressor nation, not a secure one. Fully autonomous lethal weapons—no human control—are dangerous and ethically unacceptable. Nuclear first-use policy would provoke global instability. Also, constitutional right to carry arms without checks could escalate violence at home. Our party values individual liberty—but never at the cost of public safety or international peace. |
| Liberty For Belvaria! Proposer | 12 | Yes | No reason given |
| Together We Can | 13 | No | We disagree with this proposal. |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 5 | No | this is nothing we can support! |
For: 106 / 500 seats (21.2%)
Against: 141 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 253
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amish League | 0 | Abstain | We are not opposed to this bill per se, but we do not support it enough for the widespread public hate it has garnered to be worth a vote in favor. |
| Federalist Reform | 0 | No | We oppose the Military and Arms Expansion Act because it risks turning Belvaria into an aggressor nation, not a secure one. Fully autonomous lethal weapons—no human control—are dangerous and ethically unacceptable. Nuclear first-use policy would provoke global instability. Also, constitutional right to carry arms without checks could escalate violence at home. Our party values individual liberty—but never at the cost of public safety or international peace. |
| Liberty For Belvaria! Proposer | 106 | Yes | No reason given |
| Together We Can | 111 | No | We disagree with this proposal. |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 30 | No | this is nothing we can support! |
| Empty seats | 73 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“this is nothing we can support!”
“We are not opposed to this bill per se, but we do not support it enough for the widespread public hate it has garnered to be worth a vote in favor.”
“We oppose the Military and Arms Expansion Act because it risks turning Belvaria into an aggressor nation, not a secure one. Fully autonomous lethal weapons—no human control—are dangerous and ethically unacceptable. Nuclear first-use policy would provoke global instability. Also, constitutional right to carry arms without checks could escalate violence at home. Our party values individual liberty—but never at the cost of public safety or international peace.”
“We disagree with this proposal.”