“whilst not agreeing with all of them, I believe this is a step in the right direction”
Media, Protest And Governance Adjustments of 2024
Rationale
Balancing free speech, unity and security while modernizing governance for efficiency and public safety.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Media Censorship Policy |
Free press (no prior restraints; narrow limits for direct incitement only)
|
Targeted regulation (post-publication fines for incitement/defamation; independent regulator)
|
|
| 2 | National Anthem in Schools |
Mandatory daily anthem (all students present; opt-out only for documented reasons)
|
National anthem played hourly in all public spaces; citizens must stand
|
|
| 3 | Government Transparency |
Open by default; contracts, meetings and expenses all published
|
Freedom-of-information system with security exemptions
|
|
| 4 | Right to Protest |
Unrestricted right to assemble
|
Right to protest with prior notice
|
1
Media Censorship Policy2
National Anthem in Schools3
Government Transparency4
Right to ProtestProposer
Party
Alternative For Belvaria
Alternative for Belvaria is a patriotic populist movement founded to restore stability, prosperity, and pride to our nation. We'd make belvaria great for once and stand against difficulties.
Core pillars
Karin Hahn
Candidate for Federal Chancellor · Age 51
Karin Hahn’s decades of grassroots organizing—from union halls to town councils—have made her the party’s unshakable backbone, feared by rivals and trusted by allies.
Timeline
-
Draft5 August 2024
-
Vote Open5 August 2024
-
Vote Closed4 October 2024
-
Did Not Become Law4 October 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Federal Council
FailedFor: 15 / 70 seats (21.4%)
Against: 31 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 24
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For Belvaria Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Citizen Core | 0 | Yes | whilst not agreeing with all of them, I believe this is a step in the right direction |
| Freedom For Us | 17 | No | The National Anthem Clause appears to infringe upon freedom of expression (Article XII of our Constitution), because compelling citizens to stand during the Anthem may contradict their personal beliefs. Therefore, we would vote against this Bill. |
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria | 15 | Yes | We wanted to propose several of these options, so yes, we agree. |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 14 | No | These changes would hurt belvaria |
National Parliament
FailedFor: 148 / 500 seats (29.6%)
Against: 170 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 182
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For Belvaria Proposer | 18 | Yes | No reason given |
| Citizen Core | 27 | Yes | whilst not agreeing with all of them, I believe this is a step in the right direction |
| Freedom For Us | 149 | No | The National Anthem Clause appears to infringe upon freedom of expression (Article XII of our Constitution), because compelling citizens to stand during the Anthem may contradict their personal beliefs. Therefore, we would vote against this Bill. |
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria | 103 | Yes | We wanted to propose several of these options, so yes, we agree. |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 21 | No | These changes would hurt belvaria |
| Empty seats | 73 | Not voted |
Federal Chancellor
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gertrud Hahn | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
President
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ursula Hoffmann | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We wanted to propose several of these options, so yes, we agree.”
“These changes would hurt belvaria”
“The National Anthem Clause appears to infringe upon freedom of expression (Article XII of our Constitution), because compelling citizens to stand during the Anthem may contradict their personal beliefs. Therefore, we would vote against this Bill.”