Key Industries Regulation Amendment of 2024 - Belvaria

Rationale

Transitioning key industries to private ownership with strong regulation boosts efficiency and innovation while ensuring consumer protection and fair pricing.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	Public Ownership of Key Industries	Public ownership of natural monopolies		Private, with strong regulation

1

Public Ownership of Key Industries

Previous law

Public ownership of natural monopolies

Private, with strong regulation

Proposer

Party

Citizen Core

Citizen Core forges a nation of pride with strong borders and fair wages where every worker thrives under the same sky.

Core pillars

NH

Noah Herrmann

Candidate for President · Age 54

227,079 social followers

A retired military strategist turned public intellectual, his sharp analyses and media savvy have made him a household name, though his disciplined past still shapes his approach to reform.

🔬 Analytical ⭐ Celebrity 🎖️ Former Military 📺 Media Savvy 🔗 Well Connected

Timeline

Draft

16 October 2024
Vote Open

16 October 2024
Vote Closed

15 December 2024
Did Not Become Law

15 December 2024

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Federal Council

Failed

7Yes 28No 28Abstained 7Not voted 70 seats

For: 7 / 70 seats (10.0%)

Against: 28 · Abstained: 28 · Not voted: 7

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 20.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Alternative For Belvaria	3	No	a privatized ownership is bad.
Belvarian Peoples Union	10	No	key industries belong to the people not hte private sector so we will vote against this proposal
Citizen Core Proposer	7	Yes	No reason given
Freedom For Us	28	Abstain	This could go in the middle of nowhere; while the Country loses its possession, private sectors' ownership is strongly controlled whereby they can't make the most of the resources.
Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria	15	No	Ownership must remain public; privatization affects vulnerable citizens.

National Parliament

Failed

27Yes 230No 149Abstained 94Not voted 500 seats

For: 27 / 500 seats (5.4%)

Against: 230 · Abstained: 149 · Not voted: 94

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 10.5%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Alternative For Belvaria	18	No	a privatized ownership is bad.
Belvarian Peoples Union	109	No	key industries belong to the people not hte private sector so we will vote against this proposal
Citizen Core Proposer	27	Yes	No reason given
Freedom For Us	149	Abstain	This could go in the middle of nowhere; while the Country loses its possession, private sectors' ownership is strongly controlled whereby they can't make the most of the resources.
Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria	103	No	Ownership must remain public; privatization affects vulnerable citizens.
Empty seats	73	Not voted

Federal Chancellor

Passed

0Yes 0No 1Abstained 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 1 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Clara König	1	Abstain	No reason given

President

Failed

0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Ursula Hoffmann	1	No	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

Freedom For Us

Voted Dec. 4, 2024

Abstain

“This could go in the middle of nowhere; while the Country loses its possession, private sectors' ownership is strongly controlled whereby they can't make the most of the resources.”

Alternative For Belvaria

Voted Nov. 8, 2024

No

“a privatized ownership is bad.”

Belvarian Peoples Union

Voted Nov. 4, 2024

No

“key industries belong to the people not hte private sector so we will vote against this proposal”

Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria

Voted Oct. 20, 2024

No

“Ownership must remain public; privatization affects vulnerable citizens.”