Green Freedom Act of 2021
Rationale
This proposal aims to drastically reduce carbon emissions in Belvaria, introduce new sources of cheap and abundant green energy, and stop the spread of armed police.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fossil Fuel Extraction |
Managed wind-down
|
Ban all new extraction
|
|
| 2 | Hunting & Field Sports |
Licensed, regulated hunting
|
Total ban on hunting for sport
|
|
| 3 | Armed Police |
Mostly unarmed; specialist armed units on call
|
Unarmed except by special authorisation
|
|
| 4 | Nuclear Power |
Major nuclear build-out
|
Major nuclear build-out
|
1
Fossil Fuel Extraction2
Hunting & Field Sports3
Armed Police4
Nuclear PowerProposer
Party
Together We Can
We live in a broken country, and together, we can fix it. We can remember the forgotten many, put people before profit, give everyone an equal chance, and build a fairer future based on parity, prosperity and progress.
Core pillars
Emma Lang
Activist · Age 44
A working-class veteran who rose through the ranks after leaving the military, Emma Lang’s blunt loyalty to the party’s leadership masked a fiery determination to uplift workers, backed by a network of union allies and grassroots supporters.
Timeline
-
Draft13 January 2021
-
Vote Open16 January 2021
-
Vote Closed17 March 2021
-
Did Not Become Law17 March 2021
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Federal Council
FailedFor: 13 / 70 seats (18.6%)
Against: 54 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 3
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance Rn | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Amish League | 15 | No | The children yearn for the mines. We could not possibly take that away from them. That and you know nuclear power is dangerous as heck and all that. |
| Just A Couple Chill Guys | 14 | No | What a horrible collection of ideas |
| Liberal | 15 | No | This wilö destroy the econmy |
| Liberty For Belvaria! | 5 | No | This unfairly targets the working class and middle classes, who cannot afford more expensive energy. The only way to fund the proposed reforms would be to tax the upper classes, after which wealth flight becomes a major funding problem, simultaneously contributing to brain drain while keeping prospective immigrants out, a lose-lose scenario for every side. |
| The National Rally | 5 | No | This will destroy the economy, we canrt support this ! |
| Together We Can Proposer | 6 | Yes | No reason given |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 7 | Yes | while we oppose a nuclear build out, we agree with the rest |
National Parliament
FailedFor: 95 / 500 seats (19.0%)
Against: 363 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 42
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance Rn | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Amish League | 81 | No | The children yearn for the mines. We could not possibly take that away from them. That and you know nuclear power is dangerous as heck and all that. |
| Just A Couple Chill Guys | 91 | No | What a horrible collection of ideas |
| Liberal | 114 | No | This wilö destroy the econmy |
| Liberty For Belvaria! | 22 | No | This unfairly targets the working class and middle classes, who cannot afford more expensive energy. The only way to fund the proposed reforms would be to tax the upper classes, after which wealth flight becomes a major funding problem, simultaneously contributing to brain drain while keeping prospective immigrants out, a lose-lose scenario for every side. |
| The National Rally | 55 | No | This will destroy the economy, we canrt support this ! |
| Together We Can Proposer | 45 | Yes | No reason given |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 50 | Yes | while we oppose a nuclear build out, we agree with the rest |
| Empty seats | 73 | Not voted |
Federal Chancellor
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | 1 | No | No reason given |
President
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Just A Couple Chill Guys | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“while we oppose a nuclear build out, we agree with the rest”
“This unfairly targets the working class and middle classes, who cannot afford more expensive energy. The only way to fund the proposed reforms would be to tax the upper classes, after which wealth flight becomes a major funding problem, simultaneously contributing to brain drain while keeping prospective immigrants out, a lose-lose scenario for every side.”
“What a horrible collection of ideas”
“This will destroy the economy, we canrt support this !”
“This wilö destroy the econmy”
“The children yearn for the mines. We could not possibly take that away from them. That and you know nuclear power is dangerous as heck and all that.”