These changes ensure energy independence and reduce reliance on foreign imports while protecting jobs in traditional energy sectors.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fossil Fuel Extraction |
Licensed extraction with limits
|
Maximise domestic extraction
|
|
| 2 | Renewable Energy Mandates |
Renewables priority
|
Fossil fuels prioritized
|
Party
A party of builders and guardians who plant prosperity deep into Belvaria’s soil while standing unyielding against the tides of change.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 48
A former factory worker turned populist firebrand, Wilhelm Günther built his reputation as a union firebrand in the streets before leveraging his sharp instincts and media savvy to rise as a vocal advocate for working-class interests in the national conversation.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 15 / 70 seats (21.4%)
Against: 40 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 15
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belvarian Peoples Union | 15 | No | We have given it some thought we agree with the first point however regarding the second point we must have a balance between renewables and fossil fuels not just only relying on one source so with that we will have to decline this proposal in its current form |
| Nationalist Alliance Of Belvaria Proposer | 15 | Yes | No reason given |
| Together We Can | 19 | No | This proposal is terrible for the environment. |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 6 | No | We do not agree with this bill! |
For: 98 / 500 seats (19.6%)
Against: 295 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 107
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belvarian Peoples Union | 88 | No | We have given it some thought we agree with the first point however regarding the second point we must have a balance between renewables and fossil fuels not just only relying on one source so with that we will have to decline this proposal in its current form |
| Nationalist Alliance Of Belvaria Proposer | 98 | Yes | No reason given |
| Together We Can | 149 | No | This proposal is terrible for the environment. |
| United Left Of Belvaria | 58 | No | We do not agree with this bill! |
| Empty seats | 73 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nationalist Alliance Of Belvaria Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We do not agree with this bill!”
“We have given it some thought we agree with the first point however regarding the second point we must have a balance between renewables and fossil fuels not just only relying on one source so with that we will have to decline this proposal in its current form”
“This proposal is terrible for the environment.”
“The BPU supports this proposal we must bring back industry to the country this would create more jobs for our people”