The Government has interfered in people's personal matters and our citizens should be liberated in every way.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National Identity Cards |
Voluntary ID card
|
No national ID card
|
|
| 2 | Police Accountability |
Internal investigations with a right of appeal to an ombudsman
|
Civilian oversight board that can dismiss officers and open prosecutions
|
|
| 3 | State Surveillance Powers |
Targeted surveillance (court order required; independent oversight commissioner)
|
Strict privacy protections (right to encryption; no bulk data collection; facial recognition banned)
|
Party
We ignite freedom’s flame against greed’s shadow and build a world where no one is left in the dark.
Core pillars
Candidate for President · Age 35
Once a celebrated human rights lawyer turned media mogul, Maria Kaiser now wields her star power to champion reform, blending her idealism with shrewd pragmatism to bridge divides between politics and business.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 17 / 70 seats (24.3%)
Against: 32 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 21
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belvarian Peoples Union | 17 | No | We do not agree with Article 1 and 3 as removing these could compromise the safety of our people and their communities and ensure taht the streets stay safe |
| Freedom For Us Proposer | 17 | Yes | No reason given |
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria | 15 | No | I am voting against this proposal because I believe the proposed reforms go too far in curtailing the State's capabilities. While I support effective police oversight and the protection of citizens' privacy, I do not consider it appropriate to completely eliminate the national identity document or to impose such a sweeping ban on certain surveillance tools. I believe that security and privacy must be balanced: the State must be subject to clear checks and limits, yet it must also retain the tools necessary to ensure security and enforce the law. For these reasons, although I share some of the proposal's objectives, I cannot support the package as a whole. |
For: 121 / 500 seats (24.2%)
Against: 225 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 154
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belvarian Peoples Union | 119 | No | We do not agree with Article 1 and 3 as removing these could compromise the safety of our people and their communities and ensure taht the streets stay safe |
| Freedom For Us Proposer | 121 | Yes | No reason given |
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria | 106 | No | I am voting against this proposal because I believe the proposed reforms go too far in curtailing the State's capabilities. While I support effective police oversight and the protection of citizens' privacy, I do not consider it appropriate to completely eliminate the national identity document or to impose such a sweeping ban on certain surveillance tools. I believe that security and privacy must be balanced: the State must be subject to clear checks and limits, yet it must also retain the tools necessary to ensure security and enforce the law. For these reasons, although I share some of the proposal's objectives, I cannot support the package as a whole. |
| Empty seats | 73 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria | 1 | No | No reason given |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We do not agree with Article 1 and 3 as removing these could compromise the safety of our people and their communities and ensure taht the streets stay safe”
“I am voting against this proposal because I believe the proposed reforms go too far in curtailing the State's capabilities. While I support effective police oversight and the protection of citizens' privacy, I do not consider it appropriate to completely eliminate the national identity document or to impose such a sweeping ban on certain surveillance tools. I believe that security and privacy must be balanced: the State must be subject to clear checks and limits, yet it must also retain the tools necessary to ensure security and enforce the law. For these reasons, although I share some of the proposal's objectives, I cannot support the package as a whole.”