Social Reintegration Act of 2024 - Belvaria

Rationale

Punishing reoffenders over and over again does not resolve anything since they need treatment, not confinement.
Belvaria as a free country should change its current cost-ineffective and counterproductive approach.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	Repeat Offender Sentencing	Escalating mandatory minimums		Reoffending triggers rehabilitation orders

1

Repeat Offender Sentencing

Previous law

Escalating mandatory minimums

Reoffending triggers rehabilitation orders

Proposer

Party

Freedom For Us

We ignite freedom’s flame against greed’s shadow and build a world where no one is left in the dark.

Core pillars

CK

Clara König

Federal Chancellor · Age 43

223,835 social followers

Clara König traded a glittering stage career for a soapbox, her star power amplified by a viral call to arms against entrenched inequality that drew millions into the streets—yet her relentless idealism has left powerful allies wary of her refusal to temper her demands.

⭐ Celebrity 🛡️ Incorruptible 🔥 Firebrand

Timeline

Draft

2 May 2024
Vote Open

3 May 2024
Vote Closed

2 July 2024
Did Not Become Law

2 July 2024

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Federal Council

Passed

38Yes 32No 0Not voted 70 seats

For: 38 / 70 seats (54.3%)

Against: 32 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 54.3%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Anarchist Association	7	Yes	We support this policy of hope, not punishment
Belvarian Peoples Union	17	No	We will have to vote against this proposal we put the current law in place to ensure that our streets remain safe. To make our people feel that justice is truly being served.
Freedom For Us Proposer	17	Yes	No reason given
Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria	15	No	I am voting against this proposal because I do not consider it appropriate to replace the progressive increase in penalties for repeat offenders with rehabilitation orders. While rehabilitation can be a useful tool for certain individuals, it should not eliminate the penal response to reoffending. I believe that persistent repeat offenders must face consequences proportionate to their actions and that the system must also protect victims and society as a whole. I support rehabilitation efforts when they are compatible with public safety and the serving of a sentence, but I do not believe they should automatically replace sanctions for reoffending.
United Left Of Belvaria	14	Yes	We fully support this move!

National Parliament

Passed

275Yes 225No 0Not voted 500 seats

For: 275 / 500 seats (55.0%)

Against: 225 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 55.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Anarchist Association	55	Yes	We support this policy of hope, not punishment
Belvarian Peoples Union	119	No	We will have to vote against this proposal we put the current law in place to ensure that our streets remain safe. To make our people feel that justice is truly being served.
Freedom For Us Proposer	121	Yes	No reason given
Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria	106	No	I am voting against this proposal because I do not consider it appropriate to replace the progressive increase in penalties for repeat offenders with rehabilitation orders. While rehabilitation can be a useful tool for certain individuals, it should not eliminate the penal response to reoffending. I believe that persistent repeat offenders must face consequences proportionate to their actions and that the system must also protect victims and society as a whole. I support rehabilitation efforts when they are compatible with public safety and the serving of a sentence, but I do not believe they should automatically replace sanctions for reoffending.
United Left Of Belvaria	99	Yes	We fully support this move!
Empty seats	73	Not voted

Federal Chancellor

Failed

0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Gertrud Hahn	1	No	No reason given

President

Failed

0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Ursula Hoffmann	1	No	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

Belvarian Peoples Union

Voted May 26, 2024

No

“We will have to vote against this proposal we put the current law in place to ensure that our streets remain safe. To make our people feel that justice is truly being served.”

Anarchist Association

Voted May 22, 2024

Yes

“We support this policy of hope, not punishment”

United Left Of Belvaria

Voted May 11, 2024

Yes

“We fully support this move!”

Partido Nacionalista De Belvaria

Voted May 11, 2024

No

“I am voting against this proposal because I do not consider it appropriate to replace the progressive increase in penalties for repeat offenders with rehabilitation orders. While rehabilitation can be a useful tool for certain individuals, it should not eliminate the penal response to reoffending. I believe that persistent repeat offenders must face consequences proportionate to their actions and that the system must also protect victims and society as a whole. I support rehabilitation efforts when they are compatible with public safety and the serving of a sentence, but I do not believe they should automatically replace sanctions for reoffending.”