“Inclusion is the future”
Universal connectivity act for employment of 2024
Rationale
Ensures every home has a right to reliable broadband, closing the digital divide and enabling equal opportunities for work, education, and services.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Broadband & Digital Access |
Subsidies for rural and hard-to-reach areas
|
Universal service obligation; every home entitled to a connection
|
1
Broadband & Digital AccessProposer
Party
Centrist Alliance For National Unity
A party of moderation, building bridges between tradition and progress, so that future generations become our present and grow proud of our national identity.
Core pillars
Clifford Sinclair
Activist · Age 55
A former corporate lobbyist turned idealist reformer, his decades of insider connections now fuel his crusade for ethical governance and economic justice.
Timeline
-
Draft26 June 2024
-
Vote Open22 July 2024
-
Vote Closed20 September 2024
-
Became Law20 September 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Azonian Senate
PassedFor: 139 / 200 seats (69.5%)
Against: 44 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 17
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centrist Alliance For National Unity Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
| Levelup Azonia | 51 | Yes | Inclusion is the future |
| Liberty League | 44 | No | These kinds of bills are slippery slopes to total socialism. We are the free market party of Azonia and will not support bills to force that goods and services are provided at rates lower than the laws of supply and demand have determined. Attempting to play with the natural laws of economics will always have negative effects on the economy. Our focus should instead be on deregulation allowing more ISPs to exist in Azonia and to compete, lowering rates and increasing service quality. This bill is not the answer. |
| The National Unity Front | 87 | Yes | yes this is a positive bill |
| Empty seats | 8 | Not voted |
Azonian Parliament
PassedFor: 97 / 200 seats (48.5%)
Against: 32 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 71
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centrist Alliance For National Unity Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Levelup Azonia | 16 | Yes | Inclusion is the future |
| Liberty League | 32 | No | These kinds of bills are slippery slopes to total socialism. We are the free market party of Azonia and will not support bills to force that goods and services are provided at rates lower than the laws of supply and demand have determined. Attempting to play with the natural laws of economics will always have negative effects on the economy. Our focus should instead be on deregulation allowing more ISPs to exist in Azonia and to compete, lowering rates and increasing service quality. This bill is not the answer. |
| The National Unity Front | 81 | Yes | yes this is a positive bill |
| Empty seats | 51 | Not voted |
Deputy Chancellor
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simon Jennings | 1 | Not voted |
Governor of Azonian City
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| William Sullivan | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Head Chancellor
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clarissa Armstrong | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“These kinds of bills are slippery slopes to total socialism. We are the free market party of Azonia and will not support bills to force that goods and services are provided at rates lower than the laws of supply and demand have determined. Attempting to play with the natural laws of economics will always have negative effects on the economy. Our focus should instead be on deregulation allowing more ISPs to exist in Azonia and to compete, lowering rates and increasing service quality. This bill is not the answer.”
“yes this is a positive bill”