Medical Marijuana Policy Act of 2023 - Azonia

Rationale

This law helps people by keeping marijuana for medical needs, protecting communities, and giving patients safe, regulated access.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	Marijuana Policy	Legalization (age 21; licensed retail; THC tax; roadside impairment tests)		Medical-only (prescription/caregiver card; licensed dispensaries)

1

Marijuana Policy

Previous law

Legalization (age 21; licensed retail; THC tax; roadside impairment tests)

Medical-only (prescription/caregiver card; licensed dispensaries)

Proposer

Party

Congress United

Uniting strength and wisdom to defend our nation and nurture its future under watchful skies.

Core pillars

DR

Daniel Richardson

Activist · Age 55

34,657 social followers

A former bureaucrat turned behind-the-scenes strategist, Daniel Richardson built his reputation as the party’s go-to analyst, solving campaign puzzles with cold hard data while steering clear of the glare of the spotlight.

🔬 Analytical ⚖️ Pragmatist 🏠 Reclusive 🏙️ Street Smart

Timeline

Draft

22 January 2023
Vote Open

22 January 2023
Vote Closed

23 March 2023
Became Law

23 March 2023

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Azonian Senate

Passed

131Yes 0No 69Not voted 200 seats

For: 131 / 200 seats (65.5%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 69

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 100.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Congress United Proposer	0	Yes	No reason given
Liberty League	0	No	This proposal is a slap in the face to law-abiding Azonians who have safely and legally used marijuana since its legalization five years ago, who will now find themselves criminals as Nationaliste has pledged to enact this tyranny. No adult should be told what he or she can or can't put in their own body so long as it is not causing directly infringing upon the life, rights, or property of others.
Nationaliste	131	Yes	Nous, sommes d'accord...
Empty seats	8	Not voted

Azonian Parliament

Passed

131Yes 0No 69Not voted 200 seats

For: 131 / 200 seats (65.5%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 69

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 100.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Congress United Proposer	0	Yes	No reason given
Liberty League	0	No	This proposal is a slap in the face to law-abiding Azonians who have safely and legally used marijuana since its legalization five years ago, who will now find themselves criminals as Nationaliste has pledged to enact this tyranny. No adult should be told what he or she can or can't put in their own body so long as it is not causing directly infringing upon the life, rights, or property of others.
Nationaliste	131	Yes	Nous, sommes d'accord...
Empty seats	51	Not voted

Deputy Chancellor

Passed

1Yes 0No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Nationaliste	1	Yes	No reason given

Governor of Azonian City

Passed

1Yes 0No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Nationaliste	1	Yes	No reason given

Head Chancellor

Passed

1Yes 0No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Nationaliste	1	Yes	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

Liberty League

Voted Jan. 29, 2023

No

“This proposal is a slap in the face to law-abiding Azonians who have safely and legally used marijuana since its legalization five years ago, who will now find themselves criminals as Nationaliste has pledged to enact this tyranny. No adult should be told what he or she can or can't put in their own body so long as it is not causing directly infringing upon the life, rights, or property of others.”

Nationaliste

Voted Jan. 27, 2023

Yes

“Nous, sommes d'accord...”