To strengthen national identity and security by ensuring long-term cultural cohesion and stricter immigration control for public safety.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citizenship Requirements |
Citizenship by birth on national soil and naturalisation after 5 years' residency
|
Citizenship by blood only (jus sanguinis); 15-year residency for naturalisation
|
|
| 2 | Deportation |
Firm enforcement with appeals
|
Automatic removal, limited appeals
|
|
| 3 | Integration Requirements |
Standard language/civics requirements
|
Strict language + values tests, mandatory classes
|
Party
A unifying shield for the nation’s soul the National Defense Front forges identity into iron will and prosperity into unshakable legacy
Core pillars
Activist · Age 44
A wealthy academic with a sharp mind for policy, Francis Montgomery left the ivory tower for politics, bringing intellectual rigor and financial backing to the party, where his analytical precision and unwavering loyalty make him a key strategist.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 143 / 200 seats (71.5%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 57
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azonian Mutualism And Freedom | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Levelup Azonia | 46 | Yes | Strict but neccesary |
| National Defense Front Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Nationaliste | 97 | Yes | Oui, nous acceptons cela |
| Socalist Liberal Front | 0 | No | This ist to strict sorry |
| Socialistika | 0 | No | A clear human rights violation |
| Empty seats | 8 | Not voted |
For: 72 / 200 seats (36.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 128
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azonian Mutualism And Freedom | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Levelup Azonia | 20 | Yes | Strict but neccesary |
| National Defense Front Proposer | 29 | Yes | No reason given |
| Nationaliste | 23 | Yes | Oui, nous acceptons cela |
| Socalist Liberal Front | 0 | No | This ist to strict sorry |
| Socialistika | 0 | No | A clear human rights violation |
| Empty seats | 51 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nationaliste | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Levelup Azonia | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“A clear human rights violation”
“Strict but neccesary”
“This ist to strict sorry”
“This is criminal against people who want to be part of our society, who want to see what our great nation has to offer.”
“Oui, nous acceptons cela”