“It is an attempt to prepare the people to die in a future war”
Enhanced Security And Service Act of 2024
Rationale
To enhance public safety and national resilience by improving law enforcement effectiveness and reducing corruption through stronger deterrence measures.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Armed Police |
Mostly unarmed; specialist armed units on call
|
All frontline officers routinely armed
|
|
| 2 | Military Service Policy |
Volunteer professional army
|
National service for those 18-20
|
|
| 3 | Anti-Corruption Commission |
Commission appointed and directed by ministers
|
No dedicated body; ordinary police handle corruption
|
|
| 4 | Police Powers |
Community policing focused on prevention
|
Zero tolerance
|
1
Armed Police2
Military Service Policy3
Anti-Corruption Commission4
Police PowersProposer
Party
Monarchist Alliance
The Monarchist Alliance forges a nation unshaken by chaos. With iron will and unyielding discipline we defend our heritage and command our destiny. We basically exist to facilitate the wishs of the monarch
Core pillars
King Abdullah I
Minister of Foreign Affairs · Age 44
A decorated former officer turned strategic thinker, his sharp analytical mind now shapes national policy debates with precision honed in both military command and academic research.
Timeline
-
Draft10 April 2024
-
Vote Open10 April 2024
-
Vote Closed9 June 2024
-
Did Not Become Law9 June 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Legislative Assembly
FailedFor: 139 / 425 seats (32.7%)
Against: 183 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 103
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arab Socialist Movement | 0 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| Monarchist Alliance Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Royalist Unity Front | 139 | Yes | We agree with this proposal. |
| Secular Front | 183 | No | These are unhuman laws going against fundamental human rights. |
| Socialist-Democrat Union | 0 | No | It is an attempt to prepare the people to die in a future war |
| Empty seats | 116 | Not voted |
Supreme Council of State
FailedFor: 33 / 100 seats (33.0%)
Against: 43 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 24
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arab Socialist Movement | 0 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| Monarchist Alliance Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Royalist Unity Front | 33 | Yes | We agree with this proposal. |
| Secular Front | 43 | No | These are unhuman laws going against fundamental human rights. |
| Socialist-Democrat Union | 0 | No | It is an attempt to prepare the people to die in a future war |
High Commissioner
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We agree with this proposal.”
“We support this proposal”
“These are unhuman laws going against fundamental human rights.”